Search results

Yea it's related to einstein's photelectric effect explanation

So not this? Uploaded with ImageShack.us

^ haha nice question 3unit people will have more luck

But it is easy...?

Oh really...I did the first part, kinda looked like the answer in wolf so I assumed the parts method works

^ I know right, the pier part was odd so I just ignored it and drew a diagram. I ended up with a solid that has a 2D trapezium side view

I'd like pauline hanson to rise to more power. I'll enjoy watching her crumble lol

So my last exam is physics...thank god

Re: Trials soon wow!

Re: Trials soon Oh dear same...but parts of mechanics won't be in ours :)

How does 8/15 look?

+1 and is theta constant

Try the addition of the vertical ellipse solid and the solid rotated by the straight line, with the bounds x=3-5 or y=0-5, however your approach is (slices or shells) Curious on where you got thequestion from

think physics but if you get high in both of them they'd end up around the same scaled mark

Not as much as I used to. Instead of working out I procrastinate (started since big holidays). Why?

Wolfram can't be correct IMO. I think integration by parts will do it Yep I thought so, harrisony didn't type in the thing correctly. It looks like you have to do integration by parts at least twice

Wow....whata thread. Seriously, this went on for 18 pgs? btw everyones so short and light relative to me lol wtf

Why? What can it be used for in real life? It doesn't look very interesting...but thats just me

People can get so serious and angry over the internet. roffled

Apparently everything