• Congratulations to the Class of 2024 on your results!
    Let us know how you went here
    Got a question about your uni preferences? Ask us here

Search results

  1. HecticSandWitch

    Section I: Multiple Choice

    go for it, gl (for your assignment that is!).
  2. HecticSandWitch

    2015ers Chit-Chat Thread

    I'll bring my boyz - Albert Einstein
  3. HecticSandWitch

    Section I: Multiple Choice

    I feel like we are straying far beyond the realms of the multiple choice question and focusing too much on the scenario. The question was which of the following is the lawyer wrong about. The two answers that have been narrowed down are it must be heard by a jury or that self defence is a...
  4. HecticSandWitch

    Section I: Multiple Choice

    My mate in law school had a scenario where an individual was playing a card game with his friends on top a mountain during the tour de france, dropped the cards below and subsequently causing a huge crash where half the field got injured. Copping a kick in the nuts and dying seems incredibly...
  5. HecticSandWitch

    Section I: Multiple Choice

    How on earth is that intent to inflict grevious bodily harm? GBH is going at someone with a knife and slashing them, not kicking them in a point that will cause pain. When 'sack whacks' were a thing back in Year 8, did you call the cops for an attempted murder due to your mates intent to cause...
  6. HecticSandWitch

    2015ers Chit-Chat Thread

    wow u got fckin mugged off, appeal
  7. HecticSandWitch

    2015ers Chit-Chat Thread

    always pack a towel boiz
  8. HecticSandWitch

    Section I: Multiple Choice

    Ofc it can be a full defence, even if it wasn't intended. Say your husband is bashing you viciously, you kick him in the nuts only to rupture his testicular cancer you knew nothing about, and he dies within minutes. This cannot be charged as murder because you lacked any intent to kill. Yet...
  9. HecticSandWitch

    Section I: Multiple Choice

    Well, it is because it didn't violate any of the following: “ where the appellant ‘did not appreciate the nature of the charge to which the plea was entered’: Ferrer-Esis (1991) 55 A Crim R 231 at 233. where the plea was not ‘a free and voluntary confession’: Chiron (at 220 D-E). the ‘plea...
  10. HecticSandWitch

    Section I: Multiple Choice

    Found this from the Judicial Commision of NSW [11-545] Setting aside a guilty plea The court in Johnston v R [2009] NSWCCA 82 at [9] adopted the following passage from Hura v R (2001) 121 A Crim R 472 at [32] which set out the circumstances where a court will set aside a guilty plea: “ where...
  11. HecticSandWitch

    Section I: Multiple Choice

    Found this online in regards to plea deals: Judicial Discretion in Evaluating Plea Deals A judge has discretion to decide whether to accept or reject a plea agreement. To make that decision, the judge evaluates whether the punishment is appropriate in light of the seriousness of the charges...
  12. HecticSandWitch

    Section I: Multiple Choice

    There have been cases of murder where it has been a judge only trial, see the gittany case.
  13. HecticSandWitch

    2015ers Chit-Chat Thread

    tfw u can't distinguish know from now
  14. HecticSandWitch

    2015ers Chit-Chat Thread

    fuark yeah boiz state rank 99 atar USYD law scholarship here we go
  15. HecticSandWitch

    2015ers Chit-Chat Thread

    Throughout the HSC, I made a number of discoveries about the world I live in. While this journey was certainly a torrid one, I now have a deeper understanding of my place in the world, and have finally achieved a sense of belonging that I lacked throughout my High School years.
  16. HecticSandWitch

    Band 6 cut off this year?

    This might well be feasible actually. I'd say it'd be very high 70's though, perhaps no less than 78.
  17. HecticSandWitch

    Section I: Multiple Choice

    "In the criminal law of Australia, self-defence may be a complete defence to criminal liability for causing injury or death in defence of the person or, to a limited extent, property, or a partial defence to murder if the degree of force used was excessive." So the answer is that the lawyer was...
  18. HecticSandWitch

    2U 2015 Discussion Thread

    People such as yourself apparently ahahaha.
  19. HecticSandWitch

    2U 2015 Discussion Thread

    99-100
  20. HecticSandWitch

    Raw marks

    Omg my bad, I mean higher than 84!!! Maths has fried my brain. I was saying that there was no way 87 will be B6 cutoff.
Top