Search results

yep ok this is happening. or otherwise we both get 99.95 and go to the lunch and meet the basements (inb4 we are actually basements) and you can have a drink of cordial or orange juice muahaah

haha shit. they can have 1st and 2nd ill take 3rd :P but like thats what I thought when I came out of my physics and I got 97, I was like piss off he marked way too easy, and I think he may have on the extended responses, but then I saw the average was 52% and I was like well maybe not, I dunno...

if you get those marks dude, thats like a 97.

I was thinking about the sciences though, and how everyone is saying like 90+ is state rank. i was like, well say I get 20/20 for MC and full marks for calculations which are like 10 marks, then thats only 60/70 for the written part of the paper, which will obviously be hard but i don't see it...

yeh lol basically i've been working out like floor marks and ceiling marks for my subs and putting them in etc haha. What i do is put in my lowest conceivable mark for english (like 88-89) and then work out what i need to get in the rest of my subs to compensate to get a .95. And then i bump the...

totally terrible. I am srs only getting like 3-4hr done atm because of english. Still no eco study lol, thats dead and buried (hopefully I might scrape a 90 by cramming night before). I'm really just down to the point where I have to memorise and adapt so I'm not too stressed, I'll leave the...

good post ^

Re: The Loaded Dog: HSC exams - Sydney Morning Herald This is absolutely an academic argument. That is the whole point of the thread. Here are some generalisations and exaggerations you made (there are a lot of them) - You do realise that law is mostly 99.9% prestige? - the ATAR is not an...

last year was higher than usual. Its probs around the 80 mark

so much this lol.

Re: The Loaded Dog: HSC exams - Sydney Morning Herald poor post 2/10. so much spite in this post. A top tip as well, generalisation and hyperbole never work in an academic argument.

would they be able to ask about the destruction of the ozone layer specifically over the Antarctic in spring? because I haven't seen that asked before.

shit lol I must revise up on the catchment area stuff, that would be the worst. There could be a titration explanation too... or they could do the Ostwald process thing they did last year with the new stimulus.

the only thing im not sure about is their flexibility with this type of question, because it has been done before and what variant on the question can they ask? I know this is never going to happen but I would love to see them ask an identification of cations in solution question lol.

start with LHS. get the 1 off the fraction. Multiply top and bottom of fraction by cos use the external angle method to get sin(x-pi/4) on top and cos(x-pi/4) on the bottom :)

I made this kids sig :')

Preliminary 2012 Results (Percent and rank) 2u Maths: 100, 1/50 MX1: 96, 1/20 Chem: 99, 1/19 Phys: 97, 1/9 Bio: 28, 38/38 (dropping LOL) Adv Eng: 60, 30/42 HSC goal: MX1:90 MX2: 90 Phys: 90 Chem: 90 Adv Eng: 90 edit: goddamn deswa already posted :P

so are you going to memorise all this, and regurgitate half of it in the exam?

how are you structuring if two additionals come up? Im just doing Intro Para 1 prescribed Para 2 1st add Para 3 prescribed Para 4 2nd add conc. Do you think that's too heavily weighted to prescribed and not additionals?

3rd one down, I love how they had to write (gangnam style) next to it.