Search results

Australia doesn't need a bill of rights, he's right maybe just not for the right reasons.

What else can be done other than turning a blind eye, the world isn't so righteous that all nations would stand up to the actions of one like China if it meant it would be detrimental to themselves.

"It is sometimes suggested that all this talk of sacred objects and sacrosanct principles is so much empty rhetoric." Ben Rogers

If Sir Winston Leonard Spencer Churchill thought so, then so do I.

:)

That's the spirit, identify her as inferior and then proceed to... well, throw it in her face. That tendancy to dominate those who we consider to be lesser than ourselves is exactly the trait needed to shoot someone in the face. Individual perception of one's own importance is something that...

So, your proof that China has come a long way is that they won an Olympics and that they are developing(I assume you mean in terms of economic growth). They have how many people? 1.3billion? A Human Development Index of less than 0.78. Negligible wages in comparison to other OECD advanced...

"the institution of marriage pre-dates reliable recorded history" Straight from your wikipedia article, so that would mean noone is at liberty to say whether it originated from religion or not. I now expect someone to tell me that i've missed something.

Overall view is that you shouldn't. Assuming it was legal anyway then I would have to say any day before its due date, Early or late is the same to me, it's still just killing a baby whenever you do it.

My point was that I responded to your irony with some irony of my own. And yes I do need a shovel but not because I need any assistance in digging holes, I would like one to smash my self in the head with(which i'm sure you're all happy to hear).

It isn't just the Catholic beliefs, I can't stress that enough and who is to say that the act of practicing homosexuality isn't as bad to the Catholics as practicing Catholicism is to the homosexuals. Typical of people to randomly choose one side of a two sided arguement that they have no stake...

I feel that it isn't that simple, ultimately the military wants to have the most effective fighting force within the given budget. The potential issues that arise are whether or not a female fighting next to a male will negatively effect his performance. Whether or not there could be a reverse...

Definately, most governments will avoid such an area of debate at all cost.

To be honest I don't see that as a problem in the entry requirements, it just means that the goal of the entry requirements arn't to get women who are of equal physical capacities as the men accepted. That, in my mind would be because they don't want women in the frontlines, just working in...

So let me see, inconsistancy between what I said and what I meant. Check Deception and Feigned ignorance. Check One extremely provoked antagonist. Check Which means your response was entirely expected and as a bonus to me included a hint of a reflexive jump in your mind which resulted in...

You tell me since the army has lesser physical requirements for females to be accepted.

Irony: Dissimulation; ignorance feigned for the purpose of confounding or provoking an antagonist Perhaps it is you who has misunderstood my intentions. Edit: My dear

So what you're saying is that Christianity is not intriniscally bad, just that it stands in the way of the progress you feel we must make and which also generates "delusion-driven mediocrity". Am I to understand that delusion-driven mediocrity is a good thing and if not, how is that not to...

You want to be valued? That seems uncharacteristically human and unscientific of you.

You just swayed my opinion from middle ground to a clear cut yes.