Search results

Between both increased investment and business growth I am confident that it would offset the lost revenue just not in the short term, even if it didn't, they shouldn't haven spent so much anyway.

only one thing left to say....epic girlfriend

Regular forces don't use Sub Machine Guns or shotguns as far as I know.

What about weapons like the SR-25 and M4 that spec ops use? what would recoil be like on them?

I would be slowly removing both business and capital gains tax, in my opinion it has an adverse effect on our productive capacity in the future and does nothing more than hinder Investment and Business growth in a time where the government has decided to make a rediculously large Budget...

Maybe you don't hate Gillard enough?

Blasphemy! I would fight and die under that flag and no other.

Despite my dislike of Mr Rudd, i'm beginning to to love him comparatively to Julia *shutters* Gillard.

Better reflex time and accuracy?

You mentioned people getting killed, war is the first thing I associate with death. Sorry if I misinterpreted what you said, I often have in recent times, as if to say i'm not quite switched on. Gratz on over 4k posts as well.

I'm 95% certain you pulled that average time out of nowhere. Wikipedia serves its purpose but at the end of the day, I'm not willing to risk much on the quality of its content and authenticity. I'll admit it is extremely helpful.

I now start with the infamous, Oh Please. If not about religion it's about something else. Wars in the past were destined to happen with or without religion just as wars will inevitably occur in the future unless the sun collides with earth. And you know what, we are so prone to fighting that...

A don't care how little you value sentiment, so no it isn't my problem. You're the picture of mental health. Controvertist by nature, cold in action.

Right, since a neutral third party sides against you, automatically they misinterpreted the aforementioned.

Seems to me like you're worse towards Christians than what they are towards homosexuals. Excuse me while I spit on your university degree's.

My point is this, regardless of where marriage originated or when it came about, I can find no reason at all why anyone should bother getting married if not for a religious purpose other than how you become viewed for legal purposes. So if Christians find it to be holy Sanctity, then who are you...

Because wikipedia knows everything?

Only four from about six or seven in year 11.

Origin doesn't matter in these circumstances. I'm sure most Christians consider it to be a Christian practice. Ohh and the "or something" is really reassuring.

uhh huh, institutionalised, thats generally my key for walking away but I do see your point so I suppose i'll let this be an exception. So how exactly do you tell someone that they don't have the right to ignore other people's rights in a way in which they'll actually listen?