Search results

+1. I'm sick of cunts bragging about how good their ranks are. I especially hate it when people say something like 'I'll be dissapointed if i get a UAI of anything less tha 99.5" lol.

i love money, even though i'm a poor cunt lol. hopefully that will change 1 day (the latter).

1) You do so many statistics units, and from my experience with statistics, so much of it overlaps with 'maths' so yeah. 2) http://www.qedactuarial.com.au/salary_survey_off/QED%20Aust%20Survey%202007%20Report.pdf Normal job is a bit of an understatement lol. Not to say the pay is ridiculously...

yeah don't go hating on macq. i do acst and appfin there and it seems pretty good so far. unlike the other unsw noobs we learn actuarial units first sem :P

not everyone is naturally smart.

I was joking lol. Actuarial suits me so well, i actually enjoy waking up at 6 to go to uni. Great course, great people = awesome.

yeah. everyone uses msn or some form of email IM account. facebook is popular too.

i r also inteligent

all jokes aside, i do actuarial and appfin at macquarie lol.

nope it's really bad for everything. it's one of the worse uni s in the world.

10min bus ride i hate u:P takes me 2 hours from when i leave too when i walk in. gg lol.

don't remember saying it was good lol. all i said is it's an easy way to make friends.

There isn't really anything to prove, isn't it just based on what our definition of 1, 2 and + is. For the 1+0 = 1 though you can use the identity axiom.

not a fan of dota?

I worked out what you can do. Step 1: Get DOTA, and become good. Step 2: Get a laptop Step 3: Play DOTA during lectures (works better if ur sitting in front of masses of asian people) Step 4: Time how long it takes to make friends (should be <1min). Step 5: ????? Step 6: Profit.

Was a while back but yeah we got tboned. i got a few stitches in my neck from broken glass and my left leg was badly bruised but apart from that nothing :haha:

sounds like me in actuarial. i'm like one of the few white people :)

YEAHHH!

b) would just be the same thing as c) but without the 2 x. Pretty much it's 4p2 (number of ways you can rearrange 2 people in 1 queue) x 6p6 (the number of ways the rest of the people can be rearranged).

The number of combinations is 2 x 4p2 x 6p6. Pretty much 2 is from the fact that they can be in either of the two rows, the 4p2 is from the number of ways you can rearrange the two people in a row of 4, and 6p6 is the number of ways you can choose the remaining 6 others. Makes sense?