Search results

don't think I'm supporting Rudd, Lauchlan. Ineffective spending is stupid too, I'm just saying that a surplus doesn't mean anything if you have achieved it by failing to spend when necessary.

Howard delivered a strong surplus? Oh and here I was thinking it was BHP Billiton I didn't realise taxing people too much and then not spending it on improving the country was sound economic management.

If sea levels rose by 7m my house would have a view of lake cook (formerly known as cooks river)

Anyone listen? Psycho Punks and Noisecontrollers sets are supposed to be fucking awesome. NCs played a nuts hardcore encore check it out: http://lsdb.eu/list/event/18971/In_Qontrol_2010.html

oh contraire, things that are considered leading theories are the best explanation we currently have. They are virtually established fact e.g. the theory of special relativity (which we utilise for extremely accurate time keeping for GPS) and the theory of evolution. I hate this "some scientist...

geological evidence, coral growth and decline, sediment analysis. They aren't relying on 1700s measurements you fucktard. Seriously, quit talking about anything science related you have been wrong about everything you have talked about so far.

no they aren't divided on this. The IPCC says: "Warming of the climate system is unequivocal, as is now evident from observations of increases in global average air and ocean temperatures, widespread melting of snow and ice and rising global average sea level.....There is very high confidence...

568, <7 or you suck m8

pman you know nothing about anything apparently. Antarctica is a landmass, if the icepack on top of it melt, and if glaciers that are on land melt, sea levels rise.

no it's not because you can't be gay and catholic.

I almost got this to actually happen :( here's my windows one: Also note my awesome firefox theme thingy

I prefer 78% nitrogen tbh

how in fucks name are you going to sell power to new zealand you r-tard? nuclear for base load ye SEGS in California produces 384 MW from 6.5 km^2 NSW uses about 20,000 MW peak. that means we'd need (hypothetically) 338.54 km^2 of solar panels. land area of NSW is 809,444 km2 Edit: though...

okay so humour me, we switch to solar and wind power, what is the downside?

ahahhaahhahahah yeah definitely this bro..

latex does this thing called stretch... so yeah, they shouldn't slip if you use them properly but if you have a skinny penis I guess it would idk. I've never had trouble with condoms, no breakages etc. edit: actually sometimes in the dark I have tried to roll them the wrong way and wasted a couple

just be careful if you ever go overseas that you don't fall off the edge of god's earth

why in fucks name do you have power cables running out your window? That unsightly view is far worse than a hint of cigarette smoke.

the hilarious thing is that if it has the benefit of reducing the number of smokers there will be a massive revenue gap that then needs filling. If that was the real reason it could be achieved through other means such as refusing to pay for treatment of smoking related illness. Fact of the...

popularity is a sure sign of reliabiity...