Search results

So hard or easy?

they dont scale the trials tho do they? or do some schools just...

Yeah i did something similar, only using plastic bags and humidity probes...i wasnt expecting something like that Yeah, what was with that, I just blabbed in that one, making half of it up - talking about greater sample size, comparisons etc...AND i dont know which one it is either - were you...

he is different and a real person who did work on fruit flies...i remember reading about it at the last minute...

Yeah, what was with that...I was expecting enatiostasis or homeostasis...

No, they only return to the blood through reabsorption. The question was asking about the initial substances that dont even pass through to be reabsorbed when the bowman's capsule filters the glomerulus. Hence you cant put salt ions and glucose as they are filtered and then must be reabsorbed...

I would say the question about the prac on the plant structure to reduce water loss and also the 8 marker only cause it was pretty vague and based entirely on bullshit basically...

I dunno about fair...i thought the core was made hard as you could bullshit a lot of your answers and hence its going to be difficult to distinguish between the bands. People who studied properly are going to be ripped off. There was hardly anything on the good pracs we did and there was none of...

That is so true - thats what i was most annoyed about - nothing in depth about Pasteur and Koch, nothing on the development of vaccines, nothing about malaria:burn: So true and i put that. BUT i bet you there will be an abnormal amount of people that put the brain :rofl: it was almost a trick...

I wrote about Koch's postulates, but only briefly. Looks like a lot of other people did too. But yes, you are supposed to talk about reliability and validity, but you can use Koch's postulates as evidence, especially for the part when the guy swallows the bateria...

That question meant, what didnt pass through. ie what remains in the blood. That would mean proteins and red blood cells...

Yeah i thought the exam was good, although you could crap your way through a lot of the questions and that 8 marker was the perfect example. There didnt seem to be much on the harder concepts like the third line of defence, pedigrees or malaria, so overall i was surprised by that. Thats the...

whats with the exam thoughts thread? why isnt it working?

9 is definitely D

I got all the exact same.

So multiple choice: 1. B (definitely best answer) 2. C (definitely best answer) 3. D (some people seem to have put others, but if you read the question, its referring more to movement over time and hence thats why I put D) 4. B (definitely best answer - seismographs lol!) 5. A (definitely...

I think some people are getting confused. There are two versions, they both have some writing on them, but the one that is allowed only has the very basic stuff - the other one has like area of a circle and that sort of thing. Maths is over now tho anyway

haha that makes me laugh

Its stupid how after all these years of maths, it comes down to one exam. Something needs to be done about that...

Easy. Definitely easy. However it will come down to those stupid marking criteria crap that are always ten miles away from the question. :mad1: Heres what I got for multiple choice: 1. B 2. C 3. D 4. B 5. A 6. C 7. D 8. D 9. A 10. A 11. D 12. D 13. B 14. A 15. C