Search results

I sense that you are more outraged that a Muslim might not be in prison than you feel any sympathy toward the woman herself. But in any event, I think sometimes appeals are heard to that the legal questions that emerge can be explored.

Some sources reported a few years ago that plans were underway for a state funeral, with full knowledge (and consent) of thatcher.

Interesting, no state funeral, it will be "ceremonial"

The public service doesn't pay less tax. If you are interested in money, forget about IT in the public service, it cannot compete on wages with the private sector. If its interest and job flexibility you want then it might be an option.

I think you are the fucktard, you don't have any opinions of your own, and don't justify any of your baseless rants

Ummmm, no you aren't gay, I guess you could tell your mum if that's the kind of thing you'd want to, I wouldn't

Who cares

Brogan?

He's just not that into you

Lol, student politics

Hey, ebony is a classy lady, they aren't boobs, that is a bosom

Well that can't come as a surprise

I disagree, your second phrasing of the question is much less ambiguous. I'm a relatively smart person and I can see how providing multiple extracts could be taken from the given wording. The question is really not worded well enough to reduce ambiguity. If the wording was as it was posted then...

Then why use extracts plural in the question wording (assuming OP has posted the question wording as given). To me it sounds more like a crap teacher than a student doing Anything wrong.

But the OP said: Surely each example is an extract and unless the question said only 1 extract per text it's perfectly valid

Wait, hold on, I don't read it as two books as the extracts. The question said choose extracts from two texts. You say she use different parts of the books to show different things. Surely each part of the book is an extract. Nothing is wrong with that.

What's the problem, it said extracts, plural, she is merely answering the question

Only protest I've ever been in

You realize that a salary of 65k Means you earn more than half of all households (not people, households).