MedVision ad

Search results

  1. seanieg89

    CSSA 2013 MX2 Trial Discussion

    Yeah, unfortunately in my experience not that many are willing to invest that time.
  2. seanieg89

    CSSA 2013 MX2 Trial Discussion

    Agree that more teachers should write their own exams, but I don't have much faith in the quality of paper that the average high school maths teacher could put together...
  3. seanieg89

    HSC 2013 MX2 Marathon (archive)

    Re: HSC 2013 4U Marathon Computational complexity. This algorithm is horrendously inefficient. More efficient algorithms are exactly how they found the current largest known primes.
  4. seanieg89

    graph theory help

    no worries, good luck...some parts of graph theory are pretty fun.
  5. seanieg89

    HSC 2013 MX2 Marathon (archive)

    Re: HSC 2013 4U Marathon $As Sy123 proved, $f(m,d)$ is $1$ if $d$ divides $m$ and $0$ otherwise.\\ \\ By the definition of a prime as a positive integer greater than $1$ that is indivisible by all smaller positive integers that are greater that $1$, we get:\\ \\...
  6. seanieg89

    graph theory help

    Here is a proof for an even number of vertices, try to prove the odd case yourself (it is almost exactly the same). Our claim is that the graph on 2n vertices can have at most n^2 edges without containing a triangle, we prove this inductively. 1. The claim is clear for n=1, we simply join...
  7. seanieg89

    graph theory help

    Depends how rigorous you want to be. You could say something like: Suppose distinct vertices 1,2,3 form a triangle and without loss of generality assume 1 is in set A. Then by the way we defined our graph, 2 (being adjacent to 1) must be in set B. Similarly, 3 must be in set A. But now 1 and 3...
  8. seanieg89

    graph theory help

    \left\lfloor\frac{x}{2}\right\rfloor^2 is a tight upper bound which you can prove by induction. Intuitively, the most efficient way of constructing such graphs is splitting your vertex set into two sets A and B of roughly equal size and then joining every vertex in A to every vertex in B.
  9. seanieg89

    HSC 2013 MX2 Marathon (archive)

    Re: HSC 2013 4U Marathon No, that's just rewriting the same fallacy in a different form.
  10. seanieg89

    HSC 2013 MX2 Marathon (archive)

    Re: HSC 2013 4U Marathon Which book? Lagrange multipliers slay it pretty easily, but don't have the time to play around with MX2 tools right now. If it is something that can be done with elementary methods (I suspect it can, but nothing immediately jumps out at me) and no-one answers it by...
  11. seanieg89

    HSC 2013 MX2 Marathon (archive)

    Re: HSC 2013 4U Marathon Uhhh same issue, division will not preserve inequality in general. Eg. 2 > 1 & 5 > 2 does not imply that 2/5 > 1/2.
  12. seanieg89

    HSC 2013 MX2 Marathon (archive)

    Re: HSC 2013 4U Marathon Is it? How does finding an upper bound for the numerator and an upper bound for the denominator help us find a lower bound for a fraction?
  13. seanieg89

    Australian Maths Competition

    Re: Australian Maths Competition 2013 What was the question?
  14. seanieg89

    So what are you guys playing at the moment?

    Medieval 2: Total War with the Stainless Steel mod...such a fun game to play!
  15. seanieg89

    Girls: Do you like indian guys?

    She likes a sport you like? omg snatch her up now, you will never find another with that much in common.
  16. seanieg89

    Girls: Do you like indian guys?

    don't ask advice if you can't handle constructive criticism.
  17. seanieg89

    Girls: Do you like indian guys?

    two words: friend zone. be a man and make your intentions clear from the outset.
  18. seanieg89

    What have you eaten today?

    because of honours? or other reasons?
Top