its notWhy is it paedophilia if a 17 year old kid has sex with a 13 year old kid, but, it's not when a 50 year old male has sex with a 30 year old woman ?
Because a thirteen year old kid cannot fully understand the possible consequences of her actions, is below the legal age of consent and is not fully sexually developed.Why is it paedophilia if a 17 year old kid has sex with a 13 year old kid, but, it's not when a 50 year old male has sex with a 30 year old woman ?
Btw before anyone says "you're in support of paedophilia, bla bla bla, why are you even questioning that, bla bla bla", I'm asking simply because you never hear the 50yo against the 30yo being labelled as paedophilia.Why is it paedophilia if a 17 year old kid has sex with a 13 year old kid, but, it's not when a 50 year old male has sex with a 30 year old woman ?
The difference is explained by lockedbox as both the 17 and 13 year old are under the age of 18 so they technically by law, they are not fully aware of their actions. The 50 and 30yo are adults and of course they are aware of their actions. Thats why paedophilia is commonly seen as old men preying on children as they do not know the consequences.Btw before anyone says "you're in support of paedophilia, bla bla bla, why are you even questioning that, bla bla bla", I'm asking simply because you never hear the 50yo against the 30yo being labelled as paedophilia.
just a straight forward answerBtw before anyone says "you're in support of paedophilia, bla bla bla, why are you even questioning that, bla bla bla", I'm asking simply because you never hear the 50yo against the 30yo being labelled as paedophilia.
blunt yet true.it isnt the age gap that matters it is purely the age of the parties involved
all parties have to be above 16 to be able to give consent, below that age you are incapable of giving consent because you are borderline retarded