Because they might not want to live in shitty iraq or afghanistan anymore? ever thought of that? Not exactly theyre sneaking over and cause OMG TERRORIRSZM. Most terror attacks in western country are caused by people with legitimate visas' anyway (lots of chemical engineering students... go figure). it just means the 10% don't qualify as refugees, but it doesn't mean there here to cause harm.
Well I don't want people in this country who have practically no identity, and neither do a lot of other people, and being sarcastic about terrorism is completely immature to say the least. I understand that the majority of them are not here to cause harm, but terrorism, whether you like it or not, is a real threat in society today. That's besides the point anyway, if they are confirmed legitimate refugees then let them in. If they are not, then personally I don't want them in this country.
You know more Australians died from terror attacks overseas than in Australia right? You realize that the profile of most terrorists are
I disagree. Turning the boats around will be better. They will most likely stop trying after a while and itll be a hell of a lot cheaper. Or we could stop it happening at the source and do a deal with Indonesia to stop them in their tracks
I must ask you, do you even read brah?
I never once said that you were incorrect about the profile of a terrorist, so extrapolating on that was rather unnecessary... If you're that narrow minded to think terrorist organisations wouldn't exploit every possible opportunity they could, especially our weak immigration laws and piss ant white knights with a "let them all come in" view, then I sure as hell don't want you, isildurrrr, involved whatsoever in our 'intelligence agency' - because there isn't much of that in you.
We have weak immigration laws? Son you must be out of your damn mind, Australia so weak that we have to send some poor brown person to a shithole to win bogan votes, yeah totally an immigration issue. You know what slips through more on immigration? Fraudulent documents, that's even more of an issue towards national security than some boat people. Terrorists infiltrating australia through dingy boats... HAH. Yeah tell the American government to really watch out for their border, terrorists are going to slip through via mexico! Yeah terrorism, such a real threat to our national security, you know its not like we didn't train indonesian death squads to do our dirty work for us. Terrorism is more of a threat to our two muslim neighbors than it is for us.
By stating we have weak immigration laws that was encompassing everything you simple minded fool, it wasn't specifically aimed at asylum seekers, however I knew when writing it you would take that approach. Needless to say I was correct. Terrorism is a real threat to our national security, and for you to think it isn't, then you're more half witted then I had originally presumed.. "Terrorism? Oh no, that only happens in America".
You do realize our biggest threat of terrorism isn't overseas jihadists right? It's mostly home grown muslim at risk youths who have turned towards radical islam. Same with the USA, their biggest threat towards national security aren't omg muslims from a cave in Afghanistan, it's mostly anti-government local militia movements, so it has nothing to do with immigration. You must been drinking too much koolaid to think terrorist attacks in australia is our biggest national security, when overseas attacks have caused more deaths towards australians. You can thank the densus 88 (indonesian anti-terror group) for keeping australians safe. I bet you didn't even know the top two terror organizations in the region have committed more harm to our muslim neighbors than us.
Where did I ever limit terrorism to only international sources? Where did I ever say that terrorist attacks were our biggest national security issue? Your whole point is flawed.
You listen wayyy too much to what politicians 'say' is going to happen haha.
