a few ppl did. its either 8.4 or 2.89WHO GOT Kc = 8.4?!?! (industrial chem)
a few ppl did. its either 8.4 or 2.89WHO GOT Kc = 8.4?!?! (industrial chem)
Dw, it will be 80 or below. I myself, and my peers found this year to b alot harder other years. Usually every year, chem needs a raw mark of like 78-82 to get 90.hope its around 80 ://
what raw mark would be needed then to be scaled to like a 78 or 80Dw, it will be 80 or below. I myself, and my peers found this year to b alot harder other years. Usually every year, chem needs a raw mark of like 78-82 to get 90.
probs a 68, can scale therewhat raw mark would be needed then to be scaled to like a 78 or 80
Nope not always. Look at my solutions here: http://community.boredofstudies.org/1255/chemistry/371002/hsc-chemistry-paper-answers.htmlINDUSTRIAL: how to do you determine if the equilibrium reaction was at equilibrium? Isn't it always at equilibrium, just that it shifts left or right?
Yeah MC was a pain in the ass, the short answers and long responses weere pre gud thobtw who else found MC way harder this year?
93-95 Probs. Some people found the exam harder than previous years (which i have no clue what part of it was genuinely difficult, apart from a few marks here and there which is expected), then maybe (MAYBE) 96 but idk if it's worth getting your hopes too high. Honestly I thought it was a very standard exam.Hi,
What do you think a raw mark of 90 or 92 will get?
Thanks
I found the MC a lil more difficult than previous years. :/ The short responses and long responses weree nice93-95 Probs. Some people found the exam harder than previous years (which i have no clue what part of it was genuinely difficult, apart from a few marks here and there which is expected), then maybe (MAYBE) 96 but idk if it's worth getting your hopes too high. Honestly I thought it was a very standard exam.
You can look at rawmarks.info for data on how past years raw marks were aligned
Sorry for late reply, I only talked about two (diaphragm and membrane) cause I was just comparing the technological improvements from diaphragm-->membrane but I sure did stuff up cause I didn't write about mercury and I'm pretty sure you had to talk about all threeHow many did you talk about? i thought u had to talk about 3 since it wanted improvements due to tech.