I'm not saying mortgages are a good idea. But you can hardly expect the government to say "haha suck it, fuckers".Captain Hero said:Yeah because I didn't buy a house I couldn't afford, did I?
I'm not saying mortgages are a good idea. But you can hardly expect the government to say "haha suck it, fuckers".Captain Hero said:Yeah because I didn't buy a house I couldn't afford, did I?
I can expect the government to say 'You guys all fucked up, you need to eat the consequences of what you did.'Trefoil said:I'm not saying mortgages are a good idea. But you can hardly expect the government to say "haha suck it, fuckers".
Yeah, shame on them for being poor and unable to afford their own house without a mortgage.Captain Hero said:I can expect the government to say 'You guys all fucked up, you need to eat the consequences of what you did.'
That's not what I said. Mortgages are fine; buying a McMansion when you work in Wal-mart, isn't.Trefoil said:Yeah, shame on them for being poor and unable to afford their own house without a mortgage.
We should totally blame them for being poor instead of lowering poverty rates, and closing the income gap.
That's very misleading. First of all, Iceland is a very strong welfare state, so issues of poverty are largely irrelevant. Second of all, national debt is not an indicator of quality of life or economic strength. Third of all, what are you smoking? Public debt is only about 30% of nominal GDP, and external debt is about $3 billion USD. Fourth of all, their GDP per capita is above $60,000. That means that your average Icelander is about twice as rich as your average Australia (which means the country is ludicrously rich - remember the population is only 300,000 - the size of Canberra). Iceland typically ranks 1st in the word for human development and boasts one of the smallest income gaps in the world.MissSarajevo said:european countries are in worse shape than america. Iceland a nation with a GDP of 20 billion $ is now deeply in debt of $ 120 billion dollar.
A lot of them did. A lot of them didn't.Captain Hero said:They borrowed outside of their means. Sorry dude but that's how it works.
That's what the Bush era republicans thought. I believe they called it 'trickle down economics'. Works a charm.withoutaface said:The best way to help the lower and middle class is by taking their money and giving it to rich bank executives.
Yeah they added $150bn of pork to it, know that. There are no guarantees of houses that are foreclosed on. If they were going to be serious they should have set up an organisation to purchase up the loans and then just index those loans while the people pay them off. If you're going to socialise it, do it right. Force AIG to split up and then do what the Europeans did.Trefoil said:The bill's passage means fewer people as are fucked.
If the bill holds the economy at least loosely together, which it is predicted it will, then that prevents further damage to the lower-middle classes not much later down the line.
"It's current form"? Did you read the amendments? I believe the bill's size increased in length by approximately 5000%. A lot of that was earmarks for various infrastructure projects, but various regulatory controls were also added to it. Not enough for Obama's liking, but the Republicans wanted it more like a blank check (which is stupid) and their votes were unfortunately needed.
High end tax cuts != corporate welfare.Trefoil said:That's what the Bush era republicans thought. I believe they called it 'trickle down economics'. Works a charm.
have you read a news lately? Iceland is on the brink of Bankruptcy, with its bank's obligations 5 times more than its GDP and its sovereign credit rating is already downgraded. for your information USA on the brink of recession is still AAA.Trefoil said:That's very misleading. First of all, Iceland is a very strong welfare state, so issues of poverty are largely irrelevant. Second of all, national debt is not an indicator of quality of life or economic strength. Third of all, what are you smoking? Public debt is only about 30% of nominal GDP, and external debt is about $3 billion USD. Fourth of all, their GDP per capita is above $60,000. That means that your average Icelander is about twice as rich as your average Australia (which means the country is ludicrously rich - remember the population is only 300,000 - the size of Canberra). Iceland typically ranks 1st in the word for human development and boasts one of the smallest income gaps in the world.
There is no way I would ever classify Iceland as 'in worse shape than America'.