• Congratulations to the Class of 2024 on your results!
    Let us know how you went here
    Got a question about your uni preferences? Ask us here

HSC 2016 MX2 Integration Marathon (archive) (6 Viewers)

Status
Not open for further replies.

leehuan

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 31, 2014
Messages
5,805
Gender
Male
HSC
2015
Re: MX2 2016 Integration Marathon

Oh wow

Trig sub went right over your head
 

Drsoccerball

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 28, 2014
Messages
3,650
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
2015
Re: MX2 2016 Integration Marathon

Oh lol. Cause you quoted the post making it seem like you ignored trig sub.

But, um, wow m8
I think my method would be faster if I knew inverse hyperbolic functions.
 

leehuan

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 31, 2014
Messages
5,805
Gender
Male
HSC
2015
Re: MX2 2016 Integration Marathon

Strangely enough I had - in my head but wrote +. I even wondered "hm where did this + come from"

In that case, after the secant substitution...



This isn't even hard. A very nice result comes direct out of a tangent half-angle substitution
 

Paradoxica

-insert title here-
Joined
Jun 19, 2014
Messages
2,556
Location
Outside reality
Gender
Male
HSC
2016
Re: MX2 2016 Integration Marathon

Strangely enough I had - in my head but wrote +. I even wondered "hm where did this + come from"

In that case, after the secant substitution...



This isn't even hard. A very nice result comes direct out of a tangent half-angle substitution
 

leehuan

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 31, 2014
Messages
5,805
Gender
Male
HSC
2015
Re: MX2 2016 Integration Marathon

I considered it briefly, because I knew 1/(1±sinx) and 1/(1±cosx) were simple integrals that could be manipulated without the substitution using a Pythagorean identity. But being lazy to continue I checked on W.A. and you can just make it equal to -tan(x/2) anyhow.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 6)

Top