Green Yoda
Hi Φ
- Joined
- Mar 28, 2015
- Messages
- 2,859
- Gender
- Male
- HSC
- 2017
Re: International Baccalaureate Marathon 2016
im just curious lol
im just curious lol
The former hahaDo you mean the answer is obvious, or the question isn't of interest?
Well you should probably look at the populations of the countries too. I haven't searched up school-age populations, but in terms of overall populations (from memory), US is about 5 times that of UK (and about 60 times that of Australia).I had this general assumption that the IB was a more UK orientated curriculum being implemented worldwide , and had this idea that the majority of the students were from there.
Doing this research tonight, i did a quick ratio of IB students/population, the ratio of US students to UK students taking the IB is 4 times higher.
I don't know what is meant by this. I'd guess in the U.S. less than 1 in 100 does the IB; maybe 1 in 500. In NSW, last year, maybe less than 500 opted for the IB, over the HSC.I think I'll be honest, if you read the Haeese Maths textbooks (which are published in Adelaide), you would say the NSW curriculum is harder.
Let's not kid ourselves, doing an international recognised curriculum you would generally expect the standards to be alot higher.
IB Maths November 2014
Maths Studies Candidates 2455
Maths SL Candidates 4093
Maths HL candidates 1333
IB Maths May 2014
Maths Studies 29,235
Maths SL 38,926
Maths HL 11,484
From what I gather there are two testing seasons one in May and one in November. From what I gather , is that the students in Australia prepare for the November exam. Whereas the Northern Hemisphere counterparts have to prepare for the May.
Australia has the largest intake participation in November according to the IB website with 1916/11125=17.22% candidates participating.
United States of America has the largest intake participation in May according to the IB Website with 73,028/137,330=53.17% candidates participating.
So basically (making the approximating assumption that these countries all have roughly same proportion of their total population be of Year 12 (or equivalent) age), the US has a larger ratio of its students doing the IB compared to UK (and also Australia). Were you expecting UK to have the higher proportion?So I did a quick calculation
(m)= millions of people
US Students Enrolled in IB (May) /Total Population =73028/318.9 m= 228.99 per m
UK Students Enrolled in IB (May)/Total Population = 4828/64.1 m= 75.31 per m
Aus Students Enrolled in IB (Nov)/Total Population =1916/23.13 m =82.84 per m
Yeah that was my assumption. I was totally wrong there.So basically (making the approximating assumption that these countries all have roughly same proportion of their total population be of Year 12 (or equivalent) age), the US has a larger ratio of its students doing the IB compared to UK (and also Australia). Were you expecting UK to have the higher proportion?
Compared to what: Maths General 2, 2U, Ext 1 and Ext 2? I don't agree the HSC is harder except Ext 2 is quite challenging. But look at the Option Paper - 1st Yr University stuff. Also you may be interested to know there is also the IB Further Maths subject comprising all the HL options: Calculus (not your usual high school calculus), Discrete Maths, Sets, Relations & Groups and Statistics & Probability, (Advanced Euclidean) Geometry. I wonder if any student last year put up his/her hand for this subject - heard there was one from Trinity Grammar.I think I'll be honest, if you read the Haeese Maths textbooks (which are published in Adelaide), you would say the NSW curriculum is harder.
.
I think this statement is true. The Haeese books are very well written, maybe its because I haven't gone through most of the questions or have never sat the IB, but I do feel like the difficulty is not as the same as the Cambridge text book.C. Maybe the exercises are not that challenging.
A couple of years ago, the new Oxford text had quite a few errors. As for the Cambridge text (Dolan, Neill & Quadling), I don't like the typeface, layout and the writing style - reminiscent of the textbooks I grew up with: dry & boring and ugly. Today, with the benefits of new computer typesetting and fantastic graphics, new books can take advantage of these, making them a joy to follow.I think this statement is true. The Haeese books are very well written, maybe its because I haven't gone through most of the questions or have never sat the IB, but I do feel like the difficulty is not as the same as the Cambridge text book.
OK I just found out on the back of the book , all 4 are all Cambridge educated.It is a UK book and I know 3 of those 4 authors are Cambridge educated.