It's also apparently coz, as common sense would probably tell you, just because you can get a 5GPA in (usually) an 'easier' course doesn't mean you will do well in another.touma88 said:I think you'll see it across universities demonishing internal transfers in-house. Its a ploy to increase revenue for UAC and gov.
there is no such thing as a single "nrsl mark". that's just an abbreviation coined by boredofstudies forum members for the sake of simplicity. each uni has their own policies, from my understanding, most course transfers only take into consideration GPA. law-related or higher entry courses usually take into account GPA in addition to UAI.klh said:well, even if internal transfers cease, uws policy is more forgiving than other unis, they dont use nrsl marks, they just take the highest marks you have and use that as the selection criteria, e.g. if your uai/gpa/work expereince/diploma/etc. gives you a high mark/rank, thats what uws will use, there is no averaging out uai and gpa. So its really just hte cost factor for uac and the longer waiting times if you want to transfer.