(Stats is done for this sem)
(Stats is done for this sem)
Chain rule was what was on my mind, but I was getting lost at how to use it
What was your end answer?Edit: Uh, nvm, found a gap in my learning.
lel gl with calculus, most aids course(Stats is done for this sem)
I thought I had it but I probably didn't. Not sure what I could possibly do next afterWhat was your end answer?
dyinglel gl with calculus, most aids course
Idk what they want you to say with that wording and those assumptions really. Basically it just means that the image of f'(a) is a subspace of the kernel of g'(f(a)), or equivalently that the image of f'(a) is orthogonal to the gradient vector of g at f(a).I thought I had it but I probably didn't. Not sure what I could possibly do next after
I really don't feel like that should be the final answer either. Any further guidance?
What have you tried so far? Did you try maybe considering the inverse function theorem?Figures, should've thought in that direction
_______________________
That was definitely the starting point, but that just asserted that there exists an open set that is open, not right?What have you tried so far? Did you try maybe considering the inverse function theorem?
Generally this is correct, but consider the implications of f being an invertible (locally) continuous map.Image of an open set under a continuous function might not be open
Also, if V is a subset of U, then f(V) is automatically a subset of f(U) (true for any function and sets (that make sense)).That was definitely the starting point, but that just asserted that there exists an open set that is open, not right?
Yeah the latter lolAlso, if V is a subset of U, then f(V) is automatically a subset of f(U) (true for any function and sets (that make sense)).
(Or maybe you meant that it doesn't state that f(V) is open.)
NoYeah the latter lol
________________________________
Just a yes or no answer please because I can't just tell what to use immediately. I know that it converges pointwise to the zero function.
Because seeing as though it converges pointwise to something continuous I doubt I can use that, and the Weierstrass M-test doesn't even seem relevant.
Also the first term on your RHS has a mistake/typo (shouldn't have y).