You are correct for the integral given as written. For the question to work, however, the integral should be:Is the first one just 2 times the natural log of x^2+3x
You are correct for the integral given as written. For the question to work, however, the integral should be:Is the first one just 2 times the natural log of x^2+3x
If the middle term in the AP is , and we take , then the three sides of the triangle are, in increasing order, . Now, which of these must be opposite the angle given as 120o? Draw a diagram and recognise that you can use the cosine rule...How does one do part a?
If you have specific examples of errors, post them and I will check.A lot of the questions you posted have errors in them. I hope you're not trolling
The 9th post. The entire question doesn't work. a.) should be 2ln(x^2+3x)+c.If you have specific examples of errors, post them and I will check.
Nope, nevermind. Misread the 10th post. My bad, jumped to conclusions.The 10th post, M and N coordinates shout be (-1,1) and (1,1) respectively.
The 9th post has had a note added to note that there is a fault in it, as is posted above. The function should beThe 9th post. The entire question doesn't work. a.) should be 2ln(x^2+3x)+c.
The 10th post, M and N coordinates shout be (-1,1) and (1,1) respectively.
If i'm wrong please correct me, but i double checked on wolfram alpha
my bad. ApologiesThe 10th post, M and N are two of the three points of intersection of the parabloa and the circle . The points and lie on the circle but not the parabola.
+1for b), i got stuck on , how can i write that in terms of sin?
just wanna say d.) is a beautiful question
For an AP, we needfor b), i got stuck on , how can i write that in terms of sin?
Solution posted above. You need to use the condition that was established in part (a) that links and and allows you to find the specific value of .
Cheers. That connection was hard to find. Seems more like an ext1 question honestlySolution posted above. You need to use the condition that was established in part (a) that links and and allows you to find the specific value of .
It's more an illustration of the difficulty that can be worked into a question by mixing topics, IMO.Cheers. That connection was hard to find. Seems more like an ext1 question honestly