SashatheMan said:
thats the problem , you try to stick to the 7th century laws that completely dont work in this centruy. Fisrtt of all you dont follow every signle one of them , so your basicly breaking laws of islam already, and the ones yuo do follow are so premative or unnecessary that it seems silly to follow them. i think thats a BIGGER problem then if yuo try to alter the laws to the modern times
So you hear a few problems in the muslim world. That does not mean that the whole islamic world is wrong, you are totalising, as well as generalising ("you DONT do follow ALL rules"... ps how do you know that? if ONE muslim strays, it does not mean the hearts of others are impure). Furthermore, it is stressed in islam that you better yourself. I do not follow EVERY law eithier, but you are on a road to betterment, and that is what matters. You cannot simply just say, well, since you dont follow every law in the first place, then you're perpetually stuffed up.
And on the other hand, the model that you're advocating, the western developed model, has its own problems too, so using the same reasoning, that model is 'wrong' as well. There are problems within every system. Not everyone listens to the laws governed by democracy. People lie, cheat and steal. So does that make the western model incorrect?
Primitive you say? Heres some news: The US, as well as other non-muslim nations still implement capital punishment. There were hundreds of Australians during the Nguyen Van Toang incident who were calling for these laws to be re-adopted here as a stricter method of punishment, how barbaric is that?
And like others said, and i will repeat, some of the laws are taken into the hands of cultures and men, in which "absolute power corrupts absolutely"- The Taliban regime were idiots for short. They took the law into their own hands, and because the larger population of afghanistan were illiterate and powerless, they couldnt contest the laws that they preached were 'holy'.