I personally would slightly increase the right-side by afew marks each...These are estimates, based on the difficulty of the exam.
Can't guarantee accuracy.
Left column is raw mark (out of 84), right column is estimated aligned exam mark.
80 - 99
70 - 96
60 - 93
50 - 86
40 - 80
30 - 72
Thus, at a guess, E4 cut off is ~54/84.
80 - 102I personally would slightly increase the right-side by afew marks each...
...80 - 102
70 - 99
60 - 96
50 - 89
40 - 83
30 - 75
you being racist to 80s bro? its like glass ceiling v2...
80 - 99
70 - 97
60 - 94
50 - 89
40 - 83
30 - 75
It's quite a possibility considering what everyone has been saying. The test was not the hardest ever created but length and exam conditions combined created a deadly result which pulled alot of students down.is this legit.. do you really think 50 would basically equal 90 scaled mark.. such a decrease from last year..
the test wasn't that bad imo.
what about lower raw marks?the marks between bands are linear
so if 54/84 is the e4 cutoff (quite likely, i'd estimate cutoff at 54/84 this year) then
84 = 100
81 = 99
78 = 98
75 = 97
72 = 96
69 = 95
66 = 94
63 = 93
60 = 92
57 = 91
54 = 90
if you get a mark of say 59/84, that translates to 91.666666667 by this scale, and hence, your reported will be 92
hope this helped
Umm if E3 was 39/84what about lower raw marks?
okay thanks!Umm if E3 was 39/84
then E4 Raw minus E3 Raw is 15 marks
E3 = 75 reported
hence there is a one to one relationship between E3 cutoff, E4 cutoff and raw marks (only for this range, remembering that the difference is linear)
39/84 = 75
40/84 = 76
...
53/84 = 89
54/84 = 90
This is only provided if E3 = 39/84, which I'd too assume is a safe guess
lol why does this look like some maths problem that I'm solving
can you get on msn once in a while? Also yeah official is right with the raw marksoh damn, my bad, e3 is 70 not 75, lol i fail
im not sure what the e3 cutoff is theres alot of raw marks going around so you can check that