• Best of luck to the class of 2025 for their HSC exams. You got this!
    Let us know your thoughts on the HSC exams here

Someone help with this question!!! (1 Viewer)

Raginsheep

Active Member
Joined
Jun 14, 2004
Messages
1,223
Gender
Male
HSC
2005
Easier way:
1/(2p+1) > 1/(2p+2)
Thus
1/(2p+1) + 1/(2p+2) >
1/(2p+2) + 1/(2p+2) =
2/(2p+2)=
1/(p+1)
 

forstudents

Tha man
Joined
May 11, 2006
Messages
14
Gender
Male
HSC
2006
thats ok man i couldn't do most of it u did better than me..lol..Thanx a lot once again!
 

Yip

Member
Joined
Sep 14, 2005
Messages
137
Gender
Male
HSC
2006
(b) ∫<sub>m</sub><sup>m+1</sup>[1/t]dt>1/(m+1)
∫<sub>m+1</sub><sup>m+2</sup>[1/t]dt>1/(m+2)
......
∫<sub>2m-1</sub><sup>2m</sup>[1/t]dt>1/(2m)

∫<sub>m</sub><sup>m+1</sup>[1/t]dt +∫<sub>m+1</sub><sup>m+2</sup>[1/t]dt+....+∫<sub>2m-1</sub><sup>2m</sup>[1/t]dt=log[(m+1)/m]+log[(m+2)/(m+1)]+....+log[2m/(2m-1)]
=log[2m/m]=log2
Also, as proven earlier,
1/(m+1)+1/(m+2)+...+1/(2m)>=37/60

∫<sub>m</sub><sup>m+1</sup>[1/t]dt +∫<sub>m+1</sub><sup>m+2</sup>[1/t]dt+....+∫<sub>2m-1</sub><sup>2m</sup>[1/t]dt>1/(m+1)+1/(m+2)+...+1/(2m)>=37/60
Thus, log2>37/60
 

forstudents

Tha man
Joined
May 11, 2006
Messages
14
Gender
Male
HSC
2006
hey lottox i dont get one thing..y did u conclude with LHS is less than RHS? doesn't the question ask LHS>RHS? arent u suppose to reverse it again and thus gettin LHS>RHS as in question?
 
Last edited:

haque

Member
Joined
Sep 2, 2006
Messages
417
Gender
Male
HSC
2006
yip's already done the graph one but i'll provide my own solutions anyway

a) Let m=3
LHS=1/4 +1/5+1/6=37/60 hence true for m=3, assume true for m=k
1/k+1 +1/k+2 +...... +1/2k>= 37/60 consider m=k+1
1/k+2 +1/k+3 +....1/2k+1/2k+1 +1/2k+2>=37/60-1/k+1 +1/2k+1 +1/2k+2

Now we know that 1/2k+1 +1/2k+2 -1/k+1>0
thus 37/60 + 1/2k+1 +1/2k+2 -1/k+1>37/60
thus 1/k+2 +1/k+3 +...........1/2k+2>=37/60 then do the conclusion etc
b) Consider sum of rectangles and area under graph from x=m to x=2m(area graph>rectangles)
Integral 2m to m 1/t dt>1/m+1 +1/m+2 + .......1/2m>=37/60 (from above)
ln2m-lnm>37/60 hence ln2>37/60
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 1)

Top