can you post it up hereujuphleg said:Haha. I thought that was really good. Loved the fake government ads.
I've actually scanned the fake CityRail advert and I'll be posting it up in a few select stations...
can you post it up hereujuphleg said:Haha. I thought that was really good. Loved the fake government ads.
I've actually scanned the fake CityRail advert and I'll be posting it up in a few select stations...
Oooh brilliant!! Much better quality than my scan.Liberal Scum said:
MX spoofs are so 2000/01. My school newspaper (the 'Sentinel') did that ages ago, back in the days of MX and Melbourne Express. Very very old. Its intresting that they never changed the name of MX to SX.ManlyChief said:it was printed 'hx' a (very, very good) spoof of that free mx crap newspaper.
i think it was the best edition all year. except for the iraq 'fashions from the frontline' thing ... that was sick.
a lesson in newspaper historymelbournian said:MX spoofs are so 2000/01. My school newspaper (the 'Sentinel') did that ages ago, back in the days of MX and Melbourne Express. Very very old. Its intresting that they never changed the name of MX to SX.
There was Melbourne Express produces by Fairfax in the mornings (although it didn't have all the colour of MX), than there was shitty MX in the arvo's by News Ltd (nothing but pictures. Mind you, I'd rarely read either, both are pretty trashy.stazi said:a lesson in newspaper history
Something that has only entered the culture this year cannot, by definition, be "so 2000/01". Given mx launched in Sydeny only this year I think the allegation that the spoof is passe is unfair.melbournian said:MX spoofs are so 2000/01. My school newspaper (the 'Sentinel') did that ages ago, back in the days of MX and Melbourne Express. Very very old. Its intresting that they never changed the name of MX to SX.
Thats just what I was thinking.............ManlyChief said:Something that has only entered the culture this year cannot, by definition, be "so 2000/01". Given mx launched in Sydeny only this year I think the allegation that the spoof is passe is unfair.
What is that suppose to mean?jellybeenz said:If manly was just trying to be a dick to melbournian then fair enough.
I deleted a post. jelly was responding to it.ManlyChief said:What is that suppose to mean?
I don't appreciate these kind of suggestions.
EDIT: If replying to a post with such obviously inflammatory suggestions, the prudent thing (and the least you could do) would be to actually quote the post to which you are replying ...)
I have learnt my lesson- I shall always quote in case of posts being deleted.ManlyChief said:EDIT: If replying to a post with such obviously inflammatory suggestions, the prudent thing (and the least you could do) would be to actually quote the post to which you are replying ...)
ManlyChief said:Convenient.
I wish I were so unscrupulous as to post inflammatory material on here – possibly casting aspersions on fellow members – encourage debate on the matter and then have the post promptly deleted before the target of my cowardly attack had the opportunity to exercise a right of reply.