No one seems to have done q1. Don't worry, I purposely wrote the q to avoid a lot of computation. Its actually the product of all the primes up to and including 29.:)
For someone who claims to be omnipotent, you seem to have little control over reason. I can see that you have "constructed" a "reality" in which I have a fetish for postmodernism. Fortunately, I will not fall into the Nietzhe (or whoever it was that devised it) trap of a perspectivism in which...
Btw, I do also believe that this is prob a pointless argument, but what the hey. Once again you flew right over my main point. My main point is that if contractions are used "to promote fairness", then several things would occur.
1. It would be officially endorsed and recommended by the BOS...
Firstly I would give you the same advice, but it might help you improve, so I won't. Again, the onus is on you to present the figures not me, and besides if postmodernism taught you anything its that there are no facts, no transcendant truths. Maybe you're desire to search for them (or have...
First of all, you're the one who'se been stalking me and attacking all my posts, you're the aggressor here. Furthermore, I didn't reveal my major focus for an arg or two afterwords, and you can hardly talk as yours didn't come out definitively till about the 2nd or 3rd page. Anyway, your belief...
Even if her albums only ever sell less, thats still selling i.e. more sales, so if you're talking about the magnitude of sales it will still keep increasing. Furthermore, the onus is on you to provide the facts because you're the one who disputed me, and are trying to prove me wrong not the...
I apologise profusely. My first post and main argument were mainly based on title contractions as opposed to entirely based on title contractions. Nevertheless, that contradiction in degree is nowhere near as dastardly as the plethora of blatant contradictions in case I've spotted in your...
From TV, but:
"Cat: There's an old cat saying. If you want to eat tuna, expect bones.
Rimmer: There's and old human saying. If you're going to talk garbage, expect pain."
"Ace: Smoke me a kipper, I'll be back for breakfast."
That might sound all well and good if you want to bring facts into it. However, you're forgetting that these albums have had longer in the market than kelly. Therefore they can hardly be comparable. Unless you know the exact figures for the sales of those other bands after the same time that...
I am calm. It was a calm rant. If you agree with anti then why the heck did you argue with my original post which WAS purely about title contractions, and I did specifiy later on that you should make the contraction known (by using the full thing the first time)?
Having seen the two of you debate, I don't believe you can talk. At least I don't make up eminem lyrics in a debate! At any rate, the two things are linked. The mistake made by my example of Scandalous was having the nerve to come into being. Relatively speaking, artists like kelly have been...
Obviously you have to look at similar artists at about the same time, otherwise the games just no fun. As for saying that they haven't been artists long enough to seem to have a lynch mob, what about that band Scandoulus or whatever it was called?
By relatively, I was pretty much referring to relative to other "TV made groups" such as Bardot and that other group. Idol winners definitely seem to have fewer people who wish them grievous harm at least.
If you're whole point is that the results are inconclusive, then you can't say I'm wrong, just that the facts aren't in yet. Furthermore, they have been relatively successful thus far using currently available indicators (such as album sales, reviews etc).