it kinda helps if you think about the relationship between the cases. In infectious diseases, an increased amount of cases will result in an even more increased amount of cases, so it’s an exponential relationship. But since this was for a non infectious disease, that relationship wouldn’t make any sense as future cases do not rely on current prevalence/no. cases.
Surely 87 raw scales to 90
where did this number come from, do you have the solutions??
Ok thank you, I understand now, do you remember the years it was between on the x-axis?
86-> 90 last year. This exam was objectively a lot easier except our mcq were harder, look at some of their short answer. I would say it might be 88 which scales to a band 6
Nah mate
its koch's postulates... its def c
it was the one where you: (C)
where did the sols come from? do you have a copy
Check a few pages back, posted by tyewebb.
yeah they are right, I thought Q 20 was B but apart from that I got 19/20
Only I think 20 is wrong, the inflation rate is clearly 3.1%
do you know how people even get photos of these tests, I thought they were confidential/hidden from being shared until NESA releases answers
Dawg inflation rate? This is not economics.
19/20 as well but iirc i fucked up the prevention method q
Sorry, wrong subreddit
