waterfowl said:
If you don't want to believe in God thats fine, but I do so just accept that. Just in the same way you can't be swayed to know God, I can't be swayed to not know him.
waterfowl said:
Well thats you're point of view. Don't call what I and Christians believe bullshit, because I would never say what you believe is bullshit.
Proof of the openmindness of a christian
Funny. I figured that the way most of the posts depicted Christians (earlier in the thread) that Christians were the more aggressive party and enforced their beliefs.
Explicitly saying that "CHRISTIANITY IS WRONG" sounds a bit aggressive to me.
moonlightsonata said:
Once again, no one has actually put forward any reasons for believing in God.
All I've heard is, "oh it's a belief. You can't criticise someone's beliefs."
But this is plainly and painfully false - if you believe 2 + 2 = 5, you are wrong. If you believe a square has 3 sides, you are wrong. If you believe humans can jump 100 feet into the air unaided, you are wrong.
To say belief's can't be criticised is absolutely absurd. "I believe in that torturing babies for fun is right! You can't criticise my beliefs though, they're beliefs!"
Your example is bizarre. Believing that you can torture babies because its fun and a right is hazardous as well as straying from what society sees as "WRONG" thus you are implying that Christianity is WRONG.
2 + 2 = 5 is ALSO wrong. It is clearly 4, and YES I AGREE that the answer IS WRONG but you imply that christianity is therefore WRONG by your example. Personally that is such an ignorant and discriminating, narrowminded conclusion.
The stupidity of saying that it is WRONG is WITHOUT evidence, which means YOU have strayed from the argument.
The only sane person here that I've taken note of (so there are some, I just havent recognised them) is sub.