ok thanksThats as simple as it gets I think (you can usually simplify if the inverse is in the brackets) also try using \cos^{-1}(x) to get imo looks a lot better
ok thanksThats as simple as it gets I think (you can usually simplify if the inverse is in the brackets) also try using \cos^{-1}(x) to get imo looks a lot better
lmao is the answer 0? If not, I screwed upReally cool integral from stanford which a lot of people have probably seen before:
yeplmao is the answer 0
its not i think
wait let me see my mistaleThe answer is:
The graph on desmos looks like 0?The answer is:
OH IM SUCH A DUMB POO I WAS LITERALLY AT pretend from -pi\4 to pi/4The answer is:
Wasn't that in MIt integration bee as well?The answer is:
Suffering latex pain I cOH IM SUCH A DUMB POO I WAS LITERALLY AT
Sexier than you will ever be.mmm yes sexy latex completed
Really cool integral from stanford which a lot of people have probably seen before:
really?more integrals
Or we can use the king Rule:Really cool integral from stanford which a lot of people have probably seen before:
Exactly how I would have done it. Great minds think alike!Or we can use the king Rule:
(1)
(2)
Add 1 and 2 to get:
ik this trick is too advanced for me but pls explain the last step to inverse tan cosOr we can use the king Rule:
(1)
(2)
Add 1 and 2 to get:
So it's jsut using the result If you want you could do and proceed from there.ik this trick is too advanced for me but pls explain the last step to inverse tan cos