Physics Predictions/Thoughts (7 Viewers)

[splatcat]

I just use right hand for everything, just remember electrons go in other direction to protons

 

[splatcat]

Bets on them trolling us and putting 20 marks on thermo?

 

[JeffyBoi]

What mark would you guys say is around a state rank, because according to rawmarks 95 got a state rank in 2020 and 2023

 

[splatcat]

What mark would you guys say is around a state rank, because according to rawmarks 95 got a state rank in 2020 and 2023

depends how difficult the exam is

 

[BionicMango]

Do we need to know about hyperfine splitting and the zeeman effect as limitations of Bohr's model? My school went so overboard with a lot of topics so I'm not even sure if this is in the syllabus or just extra info.

Good to mention but you don’t need to explain how it works in detail, just say in strong magnetic fields

 

[BionicMango]

Right hand for positive charges and left hand for negative charges. You can never go wrong. And current is a flow of protons so use your right hand.

Reeeeeeaallly tiny detail, but a current is a flow of positive charge (thanks Franklin) not really protons, which don’t flow.

I’m only correcting you so that you don’t mention that in the exam in case it comes up! They might mark you down (they’re strict)

 

[BionicMango]

Bets on them trolling us and putting 20 marks on thermo?

 

[C2H6O]

they have to be trolling right? what the hell is this diabolical question and for SEVEN WHOLE MARKS

 

[C2H6O]

View attachment 50489

damn wtf
just read up on it and it literally is directly cause of their work on physics making them depressed RIP

 

[svad]

View attachment 50490
they have to be trolling right? what the hell is this diabolical question and for SEVEN WHOLE MARKS

i saw this and just decided to skip it whole It's for the old syllabus though right? I doubt we'd get smth like that, they probably delved into it more

 

[C2H6O]

i saw this and just decided to skip it whole It's for the old syllabus though right? I doubt we'd get smth like that, they probably delved into it more

no its current syllabus

 

[splatcat]

View attachment 50490
they have to be trolling right? what the hell is this diabolical question and for SEVEN WHOLE MARKS

Can't wait for E = mc^2 + AI to show up in the paper tomorrow

 

[v.tex]

View attachment 50490
they have to be trolling right? what the hell is this diabolical question and for SEVEN WHOLE MARKS

tffffff

 

[BionicMango]

damn wtf
just read up on it and it literally is directly cause of their work on physics making them depressed RIP

It’s a famous meme and it’s hilarious

 

[BionicMango]

View attachment 50490
they have to be trolling right? what the hell is this diabolical question and for SEVEN WHOLE MARKS

 

[splatcat]

View attachment 50491

Discussion the relevance of AI to Einstein's equation E= mc^2, justifying the need to add the constant term AI (9 Marks)

 

[BionicMango]

My response:

[insert gpt summary]

 

[splatcat]

My response:

[insert gpt summary]

Einstein’s equation E=mc2fundamentally expresses the equivalence between mass and energy, showing that a small amount of mass can be converted into a vast quantity of energy due to the speed of light squared acting as a conversion factor. In modern contexts, particularly with the emergence of Artificial Intelligence (AI), this relationship gains new conceptual relevance as AI symbolises a transformative “informational constant” linking energy, data, and intelligence. While physically the equation remains exact and unaltered, the proposed addition of an “AI” term — forming E=mc2+AI— serves as a metaphorical enhancement that recognises the influence of computational intelligence in modern energy systems. AI represents the capacity to convert electrical energy into informational “mass,” such as machine learning models or data-driven insights, which effectively store potential energy in the form of knowledge. In engineering and applied sciences, AI-driven optimisation allows for more efficient energy conversion, predictive modelling, and reduced losses, thus acting as an entropy-reduction constant that increases overall system efficiency. The “AI constant” also symbolically acknowledges the growing integration of information theory into physical sciences, aligning with concepts like Landauer’s Principle, which links computation and thermodynamic energy costs. Although not physically measurable, adding AI to Einstein’s equation reflects the evolution of human understanding — moving from passive observation of energy-mass equivalence to intelligent manipulation and optimisation of those transformations. Therefore, E=mc2+AI highlights the emergence of a new paradigm in which intelligence itself becomes an active component of energy transformation and utilisation in the modern technological world.

 

[C2H6O]

Can't wait for E = mc^2 + AI to show up in the paper tomorrow

this was already a NESA question before chat gpt was a thing so its completely possible (current syllabus btw)

 

[splatcat]

View attachment 50492
this was already a NESA question before chat gpt was a thing so its completely possible

What the actual hell. What are you actually meant to write here?