Search results

Re: Post your desktop screenshot never said i didn't like it? Bend over now bitch LOL

Re: Post your desktop screenshot ^ that is kind of an invasion of privacy but yea, that's cool

UMAT results are useless after 3 years or something iirc. I doubt employers (outside of medicine) will look highly on your UMAT

Re: Post your desktop screenshot this sinophile guy is a rapist now? What'd he do?

Yes was just about to post this with the exact same words

Haven't gotten up to this stuff in phys, but I'm pretty sure that the problem is about the electron drift and conventional current flow direction. We follow electron drift in chemistry so we deal with the movement of electrons, but in physics we deal with the positive charges (so it goes...

Haha. How have you been?

Re: Post your desktop screenshot gossip girl...seriously? And how is transmission > uT? Any reasons in terms of performance? Or does it just look better?

Thrust is constant...? The effect the force has on the object/rocket/w/e will be infinitesimal. Hmm now that I've read more of the thread, OP is confused with force on heavy masses. So long as the NET force is >0, the mass will accelerate (i.e. go faster). For this situation, we neglect...

lol...

^yea It'll be funny if the call of duty people make a game based on this in the future

Not all muslims are extremists. Therefore you can't say all muslims will react like this </thread>

Dilate it then

I'd say round up after writing down the decimal

I bet you all would agree d is incorrect. Lol Too ambiguous but... I would've picked a) for c) and b) you could say that an infinite amount fuel is required to make it go faster forever. Though a fixed max speed is never really achieved as it can only approach c, and never be c. Think someone...

no. bye (lol)

Farly certain you can do it because mathematically you're still proving it. Though it would be easier to use the more traditional approach

The older ones are the hardest (1980s). You won't be able to get 100% in it because at that time some of the current 3U stuff was in the 2U 1980s syllabus.

^ continuing the chain 5. You can't use what slyhunter said I think. You're given that the equation has a root of multiplicity of 2, differentiate and the stationary point where the x value is an integer will be the double root. Then use sum of the thing.

So you actually count the words in your reponses?